Scholarly Index
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
2021-2025 World Top1000 Scholar ranking for Optimal Experimental Design Methods.
| World rank | Scholar | Impact score | Total citations | Total publications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yaochu Jin | 99.64 | 51,976 | 764 |
| 2 | Handing Wang | 99.09 | 5,924 | 144 |
| 3 | Ying Yuan | 99.01 | 17,156 | 540 |
| 4 | Zhenzhou Lü | 98.89 | 5,051 | 229 |
| 5 | Michael Beer | 98.61 | 13,439 | 664 |
| 6 | Xueguan Song | 97.61 | 5,827 | 250 |
| 7 | Ikjin Lee | 97.45 | 4,778 | 183 |
| 8 | Qinghua Gu | 97.33 | 1,190 | 76 |
| 9 | Qi Zhou | 97.05 | 4,903 | 173 |
| 10 | Hans‐Peter Piepho | 97.04 | 26,630 | 638 |
| 11 | Liang Gao | 96.80 | 43,899 | 1,129 |
| 12 | Min‐Qian Liu | 96.70 | 2,620 | 173 |
| 13 | Chien‐Wei Wu | 96.18 | 5,706 | 234 |
| 14 | Peter Goos | 95.63 | 5,675 | 311 |
| 15 | Ruitao Lin | 95.51 | 1,840 | 135 |
| 16 | Weng Kee Wong | 95.30 | 6,648 | 245 |
| 17 | Linhan Ouyang | 94.96 | 952 | 76 |
| 18 | Thomas Jaki | 94.93 | 26,358 | 255 |
| 19 | Chao Dang | 94.89 | 1,351 | 65 |
| 20 | Frank Konietschke | 94.73 | 5,546 | 146 |
| 21 | Zhao Zhao | 94.37 | 1,003 | 72 |
| 22 | Kay Chen Tan | 94.27 | 30,265 | 652 |
| 23 | Yong Pang | 94.18 | 893 | 109 |
| 24 | Dennis K. J. Lin | 92.71 | 8,575 | 265 |
| 25 | Rumen Manolov | 92.55 | 2,348 | 128 |
| 26 | Zhihua Cui | 92.48 | 10,133 | 296 |
| 27 | Rand R. Wilcox | 92.46 | 13,080 | 416 |
| 28 | Muhammad Aslam | 92.44 | 10,094 | 754 |
| 29 | Yan‐Gang Zhao | 92.31 | 5,783 | 242 |
| 30 | Mahendra Saha | 92.30 | 810 | 96 |
| 31 | A. M. Elsawah | 92.26 | 805 | 69 |
| 32 | Kalyanmoy Deb | 92.14 | 125,289 | 637 |
| 33 | Pengfei Wei | 92.12 | 3,693 | 161 |
| 34 | Juan Zou | 92.08 | 3,111 | 156 |
| 35 | Hisao Ishibuchi | 91.50 | 26,715 | 742 |
| 36 | Hongquan Xu | 91.42 | 2,465 | 97 |
| 37 | Jianjun Wang | 91.36 | 227 | 29 |
| 38 | To‐Cheng Wang | 91.14 | 565 | 45 |
| 39 | Amandine Marrel | 90.78 | 1,413 | 46 |
| 40 | René Tanious | 90.73 | 462 | 29 |
| 41 | Kentaro Takeda | 90.53 | 617 | 60 |
| 42 | Yongsu Jung | 90.07 | 970 | 33 |
| 43 | Xun Huan | 90.05 | 1,838 | 88 |
| 44 | Shih‐Wen Liu | 89.95 | 502 | 23 |
| 45 | Zhao‐Hui Lu | 89.88 | 2,997 | 166 |
| 46 | Xiaonan Lai | 89.63 | 680 | 30 |
| 47 | Kaixuan Feng | 89.60 | 1,224 | 89 |
| 48 | Zih‐Huei Wang | 89.27 | 282 | 19 |
| 49 | Jelle J. Goeman | 89.10 | 16,070 | 243 |
| 50 | Matthias G.R. Faes | 88.90 | 2,557 | 174 |